Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Economic growth is the only solution to tackle hunger and poverty issues according to some people, whereas there are calls for stopping economic growth since it leads to the environment’s destruction. Developing some business facilities are mark of economic growth which causes some areas must be changed such as forests. Meanwhile, the government obtains significant income from economic growth.
On the one hand, this way has had a negative impact on the environment since the authority has to build supportive facilities in many sectors like health, education, and business. These ones will develop the green area as an alternative to exploit the region. For example, some developing countries in Southeast Asia have changed their forests to be entertainment sectors to attract many international tourists, yet this method causes these countries have to face either erosion or flooding in the extreme of the rainy season. This impact happens as the government ignores the forest’s functions.
On the other hand, economic growth results in a significant income for the authority which can be distributed to overcome the problem of hunger and poverty. To tackle these problems, there will be negative effects, but the government has to drive this way to reduce the problems. Most countries in Europe focused on developing industry sectors such as automotive and mining manufacturing after World War II to give job opportunities. It is crucial that society get a job in order to improve their quality of life.
In conclusion, economic growth always has an impact on the environment because constructing many facilities needs huge spaces thus green area is an alternative. However, hunger and poverty are the basic problems that must be tackled immediately; therefore, increasing economic growth is the best solution for this issue.
- International tourism is now the world s largest industry Unfortunately this creates tension rather than understanding culture of other people Do what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that national sports teams and individual men and women who represent their country should be financially supported by the government However others argue that they should be funded by non government sources Business scholarship etc Disc 73
- The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 56
- University should accept equal number of male and female students in every subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Life expectancy is increasing. What are the reasons of this? Is this a positive or negative development? 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'These' instead.
Suggestion: These
...s like health, education, and business. These ones will develop the green area as an alter...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernment ignores the forest’s functions. On the other hand, economic growth resul...
^^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th is the best solution for this issue.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, as for, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39236111111 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91947409529 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2685750189 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262383942105 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954245285137 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946965663574 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176633367059 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112778637397 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'These' instead.
Suggestion: These
...s like health, education, and business. These ones will develop the green area as an alter...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernment ignores the forest’s functions. On the other hand, economic growth resul...
^^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th is the best solution for this issue.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, as for, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39236111111 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91947409529 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2685750189 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262383942105 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954245285137 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946965663574 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176633367059 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112778637397 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.