Some people say that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty, but some other people argue that industrial growth is creating environmental problems. Discuss both vies and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people say that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty, but some other people argue that industrial growth is creating environmental problems. Discuss both vies and give your opinion.

In concurrent era, world has been suffering from he burning issue of the pollution and industrial advancement is predominant reason. The recent few decades are the witness of the development in industrial sector. Amid this development, there is one burning debate that has occurred between two faction of people about plus and minus sides of industrial advancement. An outfit of people advocate that for combating the issue of poverty, it is essential to solve unemployment problem and industrial development has ability to solve both of them. However, according to other masses, industrial revolution has detrimental effect on the environment. In this essay, i will try to throw light up on two disparate views about industrial revolution. In addition, i will also posit my perspective about it.

To commence with, there are multifarious reasons to shore those people who consider industrial growth for solving a heated issue of poverty. The first and foremost reason is to provide employment. To justify, the growth of industries is proportional to hike the demand of worker. So, people who live in local area, get job from industries. They earn money for buying bread and butter. Thus, industrial revolution plays inevitable role for enhancing the lifestyle of local worker by giving job opportunities. The another predominant reason for supporting industrial growth is eye-catching attention of government. To be specific, government pay attention for developing better school and hospitals for supporting industrial growth. Because industries are principal source of financial income of government and for smooth running society, every government need fund. Thus, government develop a lot of amenities for giving comfort to local people for supporting industries.

On the other side of the spectrum, some people argue that environmental problems are gifted by industries because land is essential for developing industries. Industries cut the trees and forest for fulfilling the need of land. Trees and forests absorb the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere which is main reason for increasing temperature of world. Nowadays, world has been suffering from several temperature related issues such as, global warming, global climate change, green house effect And so on. Hence, industrial revolution is primary reason for putting world in harsh environmental condition. The last but not the least, industries provide jobs although on the other hand, they ise local resources. They polluted the local area by spreading impurities in water, air and land. The phenomenon of spreading pollution in biosphere has detrimental effect for both of them human and environment. Also, human suffer from a lot of health issues like cancer, TB, asthma, weaker eye sight etcetera.

Agglomerating all points elaborated above it can be concluded that pros of using industrial development for solving poverty outweigh cons of harsh environmental condition by it. That is why, I support those people who blame to industries for polluting atmosphere and creating environmental issues.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-26 amrit5310 79 view
2021-07-26 amrit5310 73 view
2021-07-26 amrit5310 78 view
2021-06-25 nistiqamah 67 view
2021-06-25 nistiqamah 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'from the burning'?
Suggestion: from the burning
...oncurrent era, world has been suffering from he burning issue of the pollution and industrial a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 661, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...fect on the environment. In this essay, i will try to throw light up on two dispa...
^
Line 1, column 755, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...out industrial revolution. In addition, i will also posit my perspective about it...
^
Line 5, column 979, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
... issues like cancer, TB, asthma, weaker eye sight etcetera. Agglomerating all points e...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, in addition, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.3376753507 336% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2605.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 471.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53078556263 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99742873899 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532908704883 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.0 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5712851403 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0357142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8214285714 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10714285714 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283381774127 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082548346457 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702516181645 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181859960304 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247563536229 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.