Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
While some people think that a country can be not only successful in terms of economy but also have a clean environment, others do not have the same opinion. Both sides of the argument will be analyzed and then I will elaborate my own opinion.
It is understandable that some people believe both developed economy and unpolluted environment can co-exist in one nation due to some reasons. First, thanks to tremendous capital capability, affluent countries have been applying their breakthroughs in science and technology in figuring out alternative energy sources which are environmentally friendly and sustainable. It is predicted that in the next 5 decades, oil, coal, gas and other fossil fuels will be totally replaced.
Secondly, countries whose natural habitats is well-preserved benefit from the influx of tourists worldwide in the form of eco-tourism, the “non-smoke” industry. In contrast, nations that are trading off their environment for temporary financial advantages will lose their most precious resources.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why others believe that a developed country cannot have a clean environment. First, a prosperous economy is associated with industrial development, which required enormous amount of energy source and raw materials, ranging from wood to coal. This implicates that the more developed an economy becomes, the more its environment is exploited and the more fumes is released from manufacturing operations. Second, as a result of more advanced economy, citizens with higher living standard have increasingly greater demand for consumer goods which leads to a dramatical increase in waste and sewage.
After analyzing both sides of the argument, my own opinion is that it is difficult for a country to have a strong economy and a clean environment because we depend mainly on energy sources and do not have an efficient solution to deal with this matter, which results in a seriously environmental problem worldwide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-28 | Geegeepay | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | Geegeepay | view | |
| 2020-09-09 | tranguyen1234 | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-05 | thenaolayeu112 | 89 | view |
- in some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 67
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both view and give your opinion 87
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 89
- in some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44660194175 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06553643617 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585760517799 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7989811521 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285931294496 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102767535012 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876239046951 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166409040471 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872992389438 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.