Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Music has never been an out-of-date topic. When mentioning to this topic, it is often said that music is a preferential approach to bring people from different cultures and ages around the world. It is the firm opinion of this writer that music is inevitably the best method to connect individuals for some certain reasons. This essay will explain in details.
On the one hand, melody influences people as it is easy to remember. Songs with simple lyrics and upbeat energy are appealing to people and they are, therefore; sung widely. As a result, people who interest in the songs share some commons connecting together. Moreover, instead of utilizing long texting and all form of news to advertise and introduce the cultures, there are many nations using music as a means to marketing their countries such as, Korea or United State Of America. For instance, K-pop from Korea affecting most of the youths in Asian facilitating the bond between Korean and ranges of Asia nations.
On the other hand, people from different types of age easily connect through music as it is many individuals talking daily. For example, in one family, older generations and younger generations communicate with each other rather than texting because using electronic devices can be troublesome with older people. Hence, by using a catchy and friendly song by singing, family bond can be helped to be more stronger and sturdier. Additionally, songs such as lullaby is able to imprint crucial information such as history from mothers to children. Consequently, these children grow up remember all the culture and ancient story from the predecessors.
In conclusion, I believe that as those aforementioned arguments above, songs are obviously far more better than any forms of communication in terms of bonding global people from all ages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 78
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...inging, family bond can be helped to be more stronger and sturdier. Additionally, songs such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...rguments above, songs are obviously far more better than any forms of communication in term...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18855218855 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73556953891 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8874138554 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215599890748 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714806500275 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686409063322 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128683944361 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781479525551 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.