Some people say that parents have the most important role in a child's development. However other argue that other things liek television or friends have the most significant influence. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
To begin with, childrens's are developing everyday at a breacknect speed by the help of parents as well as modern gadgets. A host of people believe that in child's development guardians play a pivotol role wjereas other think television and friends play significant role. Each view point jave their own justification, I will discuss both the views in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, parents are the first teacher of offsprings, they can learn numerous things from parents life. The most obvious benefit is that children can learn how to tackle with situations which is major part of lifestyle. To clarify, parents know every situations in life and aware about every thing because they already face in their life। They teach to theri babies about ups and downs physically by the help of which children easily develop their skills to face problems. To cite an example, the well knowm manager of TATA company Ratan Tata recommended that parents play a pivotol role in child's development. If anyone want to success in life, then take presence of parents instead of others. Therefore, expect other things, physcial experience can esaily help to ddvelop children mind.
Apart from this, few number of masses think technological gadgest such as television, mobile phones, tablets as well as friends help to develop pupils mind. The pioneer benefit is thay it help to sharp the mind. To elaborate, on moderm gadgets mentee learn easily and in diffent style which easily understandable
They learn by pictures, vedio graphics which directly sharpen the mind and improve imagination power. Hence, some qualities are develop in the state of art, So it is better to learn from friends and gadgets.
In my opinion, for the child development the first role is of parents for development, after parents gadets are playing role in life.
In conclusion, both view point have their owm justifications, but according to my prespective the first priority is of parents to develop mind and to successed in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...o begin with, childrenss are developing everyday at a breacknect speed by the help of pa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 627, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...l role in childs development. If anyone want to success in life, then take presence ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...dvelop children mind. Apart from this, few number of masses think technological gadgest s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...ls mind. The pioneer benefit is thay it help to sharp the mind. To elaborate, on mod...
^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
...nation power. Hence, some qualities are develop in the state of art, So it is better to...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 161, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...arents to develop mind and to successed in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67531140108 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1245606041 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239332461464 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752264413586 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616213132925 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123012345755 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759144203873 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.