These days, mobile phones and the internet are very inportant to the ways ins which people relate to one another socially.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In the new millennium, due to the advancement in the field of technological gadgets and the internet are becoming pivotol to every individual. By which people are communicating with one another socially not physical. This development have both pros as well as cons I will discuss both in the subsequent pargraphs.
To begin with, According to change in the time, humans are shifting to new update technological things which benefits alot to citizens. The pioneer benefit of talking with somenone socially helps to save the precious time as well as money. To elaborate, when people are communicating with their friends, relatives physically it require time and money. In the past humans went to physical interaction with someone which waste time and travelling cost as in today's era, the technology is developing due to which by sitting at home or in foreign notions people are easily getting every update from their family in the keen speed. The main benefit of this it helps to save hours and travelling cost. Therefore, relate to one another socially is extremely benefited for human lives.
Apart form this, there are uncountable demerits of this trend. The first and foremost, it effect the relation between one another. To elucidate, talking to someone by chatting or by calling it not satisfied the mind or body whereas by physically people are more satisfied but in these days, the people are getting or giving information by mobile phones and by social apps which is not making people inner satisfaction. To cite an example, the facebook owner conductes a seminar in 2018, which reveals that maximum relations are bread down only becausd they are not interacting physically due to lack to time and money. On social apps people are giving their views that technologies are making huge distance between one another. Hence, meating physically is more beneficial than socially.
In conclusion, gadgets have both merits and demerits but according to my prespective the technology is causing numerous problem to people in the way they are talking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...socially not physical. This development have both pros as well as cons I will discus...
^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ysical. This development have both pros as well as cons I will discuss both in the subsequ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'requires'?
Suggestion: requires
... their friends, relatives physically it require time and money. In the past humans went...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: APART_FORM[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: Apart from
...s extremely benefited for human lives. Apart form this, there are uncountable demerits of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effects'?
Suggestion: effects
... this trend. The first and foremost, it effect the relation between one another. To el...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11011904762 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75386086172 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526785714286 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5157075325 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249942165351 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825905932316 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626268828906 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142383682165 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561583884393 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.