Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every way Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop

The issue of children playing computer games has been a heatedly discussed topic in the recent years, and this had turned into a dilemma facing many. Some people assert that playing computer games has negative impacts on children, while other people do not agree. From my perspective, the positive effects of computer games are far superior to negative effects.
On the one hand, playing computer games has two negative effects on children. The immediate one is students’ poor academic performance. For example, a recent survey has shown that a quarter of American children have difficulty concentrating on and completing their tasks assigned at school because their minds are always wandering to the scenarios of online games. More disturbing, though, is that computer games adversely affect the vision of children. According to the data, playing computers games for two consecutive hours will reduce vision by an average of one degree. Despite the drawbacks of computer games, the benefits cannot be ignored.
On the other hand, playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop. First and foremost, computer games, especially in shooting games, can exercise eye and hand coordination. Players must have very fast reflexes to make sure that they can win. For instance, they need to be ready to change positions and aim at the enemy as the situation changes. According to the data of Tencent Esports College, students there only have an average of less than 0.1-second reaction time to operate computers when they see any change. Second, computer games can strengthen the skills of team cooperation. For instance, PUBG is a shooting game which requires a team of four members. If one of the players does not cooperate with teammates, sometimes they will blow you up with a grenade and deduct game credit points. In the long run, children will be accustomed to collaborating with their team members.
To recapitulate, people hold different perspectives on how children may be influenced by computer games. Some people think hi-tech entertainment might do harm to children in many ways, but still, I maintain that computer games can promote the development of children, as its beneficial effects outweigh the rest.

Votes
Average: 5.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2216066482 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73219799543 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559556786704 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9466350242 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504861615644 0.244688304435 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164459798756 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153004255108 0.0667982634062 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322627700274 0.151304729494 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402713427517 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.