Some people say that smoking should be banned in all public places, even though it would restrict some of other people’s freedoms. Do you agree or disagree?
The question regarding smoking has recently become high on today’s agenda. It is argued that restrictive rules prohibiting smoking should be implemented in all public areas. I strongly agree with this statement and believe that smoking outside distorts children’s perception of smoking and it takes a heavy toll on the environment.
Firstly, smoking begins to be accepted as a normal act among youngsters. This is because teenagers tend to blindly follow what they see in the social environment. Hence smoking becomes deeply rooted in the minds of children and they start smoking. For example, according to the social research conducted by the Higher School of Economics, 78% of girls and boys started smoking because of society’s positive attitude to this action. In the other words, if we want to change the viewpoint of smoking among the younger generation, we should ban smoking cigarettes in public places and stigmatize it.
Secondly, smoking cigarettes in public places is tragically harmful for the environment.
This is because cigarette butts consist of cellulose acetate which tragically exacerbates the environment state; therefore, smokers are literally polluters. For example, St. Petersburg is mired in trash, especially in butts. The reason is that there are no strict rules governing smoking in public areas in this city. As a result, St. Petersburg is one of the most polluted cities in Europe. To sum up, smoking in public places ought to be banned if we want to save the environment and improve the quality of life.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the idea of prohibition of smoking in public areas and think that inadequate teenagers’ perception and contamination are unacceptable.
- Some people think that the government should not support creative artists and give money to the public sector Other people claim that artists should be supported by the government Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Even though doctors advise old people to get more exercise many old people do not get enough What are the reasons for this What are some possible solutions for this 89
- People nowadays sleep less than they did in the past Why is this Do you think it is a negative or positive development 56
- Because of the progress in medicine people are living longer now Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 67
- Some people think technology makes life complex so we should make life simpler without using technology Do you agree or disagree Give reasons to your answer and provide examples from your knowledge Write at least 250 words 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...hat they see in the social environment. Hence smoking becomes deeply rooted in the mi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94088233823 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6495045754 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198360358387 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696732543172 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663814119075 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117901828632 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331840904137 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...hat they see in the social environment. Hence smoking becomes deeply rooted in the mi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94088233823 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6495045754 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198360358387 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696732543172 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663814119075 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117901828632 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331840904137 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.