These days, traffic accidents are one of the most hazardous menace that humans are facing. It is still open to debate whether the main driver of this issue is the sharp increase in the number of vehicles especially motorbikes or just because of man’s fault. Personally, I wholeheartedly suppose that people’s fault plays an integral part in the significant rise in traffic accidents.
There is a fundamental rationale why motorbikes are to blame for traffic accidents. More motorbikes means the congestion is more severe when the main roads witness a huge influx of hundreds commuters who are vacationers or employees. Nevertheless, all of them try to overtake the car in front instead of being in the queue, which in turn cause the chaos and crash.
First and foremost, the incremental accidents that caused death are mostly because of adverse behaviors of numerous drivers, specially young people. Over speeding which is a commonplace for the youth, for example, intensely contributes to a drastic rise in the number of traffic accidents. However, adolescents are considered not mature enough to have an in-depth knowledge on the serious consequences of their in-disciplined actions and easily get away with what they triggered. Moreover, unsafe road environment such as slippery surface and insufficient safety facilities is admitted to serve as external factors in a high number of fatal accidents. Henceforth, it is the responsibility of the government authorities to advance the transport systems which have been in alarming condition.
In conclusion, the reasons from which traffic accidents are derived are various. However, I strongly believe that citizens need to gain understanding about traffic to deal with several inevitable hardships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ess a huge influx of hundreds commuters who are vacationers or employees. Nevertheless,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45787545788 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05878133351 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6336996337 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3689894697 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.615384615 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262059923948 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824892971703 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596459503938 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141145303863 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386350921083 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.