Some people say watching TV is bad for children in all ways others say it is good for children to get knowledge Discuss both views and give your opinion

Television is good source of entertainment as well as getting knowledge. While, some masses believe watching TV is bad to offspring in all conditions but others seem it has good as they develop to grow up. In this essay, I shall discuss both view point before reaching a valid reason.

The option of watching TV is proves good owning to today's many educational programs are telecasted on it. There are many varieties of channels like Animal World which gives knowledge related to animals. These programs are well meaningful. Moreover, many news channels also available. These are also good for gain knowledge. As a result, these types programs or channels are best for children.

There are numerous drawbacks such as lead to degradation of academic study . Consequently, juveniles will find that they have obstacles focusing in class and not be able to give performance well in assignments and exams. Finally, children watching TV in continuously for long hours. Ergo, eyesight week and physical structure is damage.

To sum up, in my opinion, parents ought to encouraged to allow their kids to watch useful programs as these are very assistfull for children's growth. However, it is important to limit the time which children spend on television.

Votes
Average: 4.8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rams or channels are best for children. There are numerous drawbacks such as lea...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...as lead to degradation of academic study . Consequently, juveniles will find that ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, moreover, so, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 204.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16176470588 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79288634897 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.676470588235 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1974746569 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328455476225 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908730696892 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796814105822 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172897073942 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477576489501 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.