Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

One school of thought holds an idea that printed newspapers are unnecessary nowadays. While this perception is somewhat justifiable, I would contend that traditional newspapers are somewhat of paramount importance for our daily lives.

On the one hand, it is understandable that printed magazines are becoming uncommon in societies. First and foremost, the advancement of technology helps people could read newspaper on internet from their electronic devices with free of charge. Accordingly, individuals are no longer need to buy physical newspaper and still could update the news on worldwide. In addition, the existence of online newspaper could bestow an enormous benefit upon the natural ecosystem. This argument could be reinforced by the fact that the absence of tradition newspaper could mitigate the number of trees which are cut down annually for manufacture printed newspapers. As a consequence, it makes humans more prone to prevent the natural environment from global warming.

On the other hands, there are a host of compelling reasons as to why I am convinced that individuals should stick with the traditional newspapers. One rationale is that some small communities may be struggled in adapting with the online newspaper. For instance, elderly people who are born in the previous generations could face with some barriers when trying to read on smartphones or computers. Subsequently, it will decrease the number of people in this age group access to online magazines. Another justification is that the widespread of online newspapers could give rise to the unstable incomes of some traditional newspaper editorial companies. In view of the fact that online newspapers are changing the way people read, therefore it has brought an adverse bearing upon the revenue sources came from printed articles for corporations. As a result, this trend could act as a precursor to the deterioration of a thriving economy.

In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that printed newspapers should be replaced by the online reading platform, I would contend that the upsides that it brings towards our societies are significantly more noteworthy.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ing. On the other hands, there are a host of compelling reasons as to why I am co...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46107784431 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06580393832 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553892215569 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9069402549 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179189865621 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060237887465 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246741991328 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105305992418 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397475715542 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.