The top priority of businesses is making money, and they do not need to have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Businesess should focusing on making revenue without concerning any social responsibilities. While I accept that this perception is somewhat justifiable, I would believe that entrepreneurs should take considerations about social duties.
On the one hand, the efforts which firms try to maximize their profits are beneficial to the government and the societies as a whole. First and foremost, the more revenue corporations earn, the higher taxes they have to pay. Therefore, government bodies could spend those taxes to build more school, hospital as well as enhance some constructions that are of paramount important to their communities. Secondly, the fact that enterprises generate more profits will create more jobs for the labor market. This is because once companies own huge budget, they could expand their scale by hiring more employees. Subsequently, this tendency would bestow enormous benefits upon the labor shortage issue in our society nowadays.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons as to why I am convinced that corporations should take social responsibilities into account. One rationale is that big enterprises possess countless impacts in the general public. For instance, Samsung which is a prestigious enterprise in Korea generates charity fund annually to donate for the orphanages around their country, and this action has spread the beautiful image of this company to the public. Another justification why companies should consider helping societies is because they have money to do so. For example, some milk production corporations in Vietnam such as Vinamilk or Unilever have taken philanthropic actions such as providing scholarships or operate charities, which could not only help those who are in need financially but also enhance their companies’ public image.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that earning profit is the top priority of businesses, I would contend that they should play a vital role in contributing social responsibilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-22 | buahkiwienak | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-22 | buahkiwienak | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 78
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 84
- The graph shows the proportions of three nutrients in three different diets Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 84
- People in many countries are spending less time with their families What are the reasons and effects of this 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ays. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons as to why I am co...
^^^^
Line 6, column 223, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...prises possess countless impacts in the general public. For instance, Samsung which is a prest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58169934641 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11764705882 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5818939833 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132273661541 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044930767042 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539103532527 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825662180576 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349257782667 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ays. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons as to why I am co...
^^^^
Line 6, column 223, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...prises possess countless impacts in the general public. For instance, Samsung which is a prest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58169934641 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11764705882 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5818939833 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132273661541 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044930767042 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539103532527 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825662180576 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349257782667 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.