Some people think advertising may have positive economic effects. Other think it has social effects because individuals are not satisfied with who they are and what they have. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recent decades have been witnessing the crucial role contributed to socio-economic aspects by media. While there are grounds to argue that advertising positively influenced the economy, it can be disputed that the whole community is communally affected by the aesthetical and physical standards. I shall examine the merits of both sides of this question and state my own opinion.
On the one hand, there are many people who claim that there is a diversity of benefits brought about by promotion to the entire economy. A convincing justification for this belief is that advertisement is a highly effective method, excessively concentrated by most enterprises, which is expected to enlarge the amount of profit. It is also possible to say that, in case companies are able to earn more and more money from the market, they would have to pay a higher charge for taxes used for national development.
On the other hand, it is feasible to make the opposing case. It is often indicated that in fact, there is an enormous number of residents being distracted by a huge batch of aesthetical and material preconceptions from appealing posts on the Internet. Individuals often have this viewpoint because most of the fancy posts are portrayed exactly as the expectation of the inhabitant, even beyond their desires. Consequently, despite all the lack of what they own, some people would ignore the critics from others to satiate their fake wants.
Having looked at both sides, there is no splendid answer to this question. On balance, however, I tend to believe that the economic impacts operated by advertising would outweigh its social drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, so, while, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13059701493 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91053147603 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634328358209 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4437383652 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223901482432 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651432637412 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321463288454 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115157522288 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00982105187101 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.