Some people think that all university students should study whatever thay like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those rrelated to science and technology. Dicuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There exists an opinion that student can choose their major subjects at university basing on what they are interested in. While others argue that they have to study only subjects that will support their life in the future, like those are relevant to science or technology. In this essay, I am going to analyze both views before stating my personal perspective.
On the one hand, “interest is the best teacher” which means only when we have passion for something can we do it better. For example, a poet must love composing prior to creating marvelous poems and a teacher must love teaching and keep students interested in mind. Students at university are not exceptions, specially they are going through the most valuable time in their whole life. If students are required to choose the subject without passion, they will not completely concentrate on studying. In other words, they can be easily distracted by outside temptation, which leads to some unexpected consequences, such as dropping out of school or relating to the society’s evils.
On the other hand, the major subjects at the tertiary education have the direct influence to students’ jobs in the near future. As the world has been developing dramatically day by day, learning something related to science and technology seem to ensure for the career of students after they graduate. Their jobs opportunities vary wildly on several fields leading to the better financial condition in the future. However, students who pursue their favorite subjects at college, sometimes they find it hard to get a job or their job cannot purchase for the individual life, let alone starting family life
In the opinion, I believe that students should be encouraged to study whatever they like as no subject is useless. Science and technology play an important role to the development of our word, but it does not follow that other less practical subjects like literature or philosophy are not useful. These subjects not only enrich people’s knowledge but also provide them essential skills as well as valuable moral lessons.
In conclusion, parents and teachers should give students a chance to study what they are fond of. By doing so, students are able to learn something that really interest themselves and this will to the contributions they make to the world as citizens in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-04 | letcallmemit | 84 | view |
- Some people think environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others however think that those problems cannot be solved unless individuals take some action Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The diagram below shows stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison when relevant 78
- More and more plastic is polluting cities countrywide and oceans in the world What are the problems caused by plastic wastes what measures should be taken to solve it 84
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09819121447 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70317091298 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2194792262 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3125 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312266299373 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933241141233 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639501191846 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180869791194 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800574041454 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09819121447 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70317091298 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2194792262 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3125 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312266299373 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933241141233 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639501191846 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180869791194 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800574041454 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.