Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Subjects taught in university educational programme continue to be a controversial topic since the years students spend there build the fundamentals of their professional career. Although personalised by students’ preference programme is thought by some to be appropriate, other people consider that focus on science and technology only is what would be useful in the future. In my opinion, I think that the diversity of information is more practical and a balanced approach combining mandatory subjects related to science and technology with subjects of students’ interest is the key to successful graduation.
Admittedly, there are many benefits of learning the core basics of science and technology, as these topics are driving the progress of humanity. Is there anything better than this, but develop an understanding of the importance these subjects hold in our future generation? Furthermore, students will have the opportunity to be part of the most vastly expanding research field which has proven to be the key to innovation.
Nevertheless, despite the benefits above, I believe higher education students are grown enough to take responsible decisions concerning their study programme and along with their mandatory subjects, a few other should be left open for their choice. This would enhance the commitment to apply themselves in the study work. One potentially dangerous problem of forcing students to focus only on science and technology related subjects is losing their interest, rendering them to drawn in boredom and despair. Thus, the easiest way to avoid such situation is to make students involved in structuring their curriculum, making them feel important in shaping their future. Secondly, students always engage with the given task with surprisingly interesting ideas, taking full advantage of the interdisciplinary approach.
In conclusion, I would suggest that the best way to ensure commitment and strong academic performance is to use the balanced approach of compulsory subjects and give them partially the freedom to come up with subjects of their choice.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.565625 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12323543931 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3684418992 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.416666667 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271858192555 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917092781449 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562969228639 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147917950824 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690161876441 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.