Some people think that all university students sould study whatever they like. Others believe that they shoyld only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
A group of individuals present the view that pupils who are going to go to university should pursue their favourite major, whereas others believe these students have to follow a study that will be necessary over the next years. I strongly agree with the former opinion.
On the one hand, some people convincingly argue that students should be free to choose their major. From an educational standpoint, educational authorities should not force students to follow special branches. By contrast, they should be encouraged to follow their interests. In my personal experience, if people find passion about one subject and grow up their knowledge in tertiary education, they will more likely to have good career prospects when they finish their education. Moreover, they will have more employment possibilities in the future.
On the other hand, another group of people claim that some subjects such as technology or science play a vital role in society in the future. They insist that pupils allow studying some subjects which are important for the next years. However, I do not this argument is convincing as if people do not like their major, they are not able to learn, and they find it difficult to continue it. I believe, all major should be developed and transformed because society is created from different parts, and it needs to have a specialist in those fields. Thus, being a professional country can open the door to having a better standard of living.
To conclude, in my view, students should not be limited to entering a major which it is not really match their interests or ability. People can become successful effortlessly in their favourite field. In addition, an improved country is powerful in every field.
- Many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects Why do they think so What can be done to change their views 73
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real needs of the society in which those products are sold Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that using mobile phones and computers has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that all university students sould study whatever they like Others believe that they shoyld only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... view that pupils who are going to go to university should pursue their favourite...
^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... They insist that pupils allow studying some subjects which are important for th...
^^
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...try can open the door to having a better standard of living. To conclude, in m...
^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a major which it is not really match their interests or ability. People can b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, really, so, thus, whereas, in addition, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06293706294 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68762648157 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56993006993 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6655696088 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314828242062 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968115293481 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634810516273 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178904127441 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863779485535 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.