In many countries household waste eg Food packing is increasing day by day What are the reasons How can this problem be solved

Essay topics:

In many countries household waste eg. Food packing is increasing day by day. What are the reasons? How can this problem be solved?

There are a range of concerns about the remarkable growth of domestic waste in many parts of the world. I find that the awareness and the impact of media can be some main reasons leading to a humongous amount of wastage. I also believe that the community can take some measures to address these issues.
There is no doubt that there are thousands of reasons contributing to increasing the quantities of household rubbish. One of them is the poor awareness of citizens intending to ignore environmental issues. For example, those people tend to use plastic packing instead of cavans when shopping. Thus, they find those kinds more convenient than the traditional ones, regardless of their negative effects on the ecosystem. Furthermore, advertisements linked with modern and complex lifestyles on media platforms also account for the sharply rising domestic trash. Residents are likely to purchase more household stuff than those they need, such as fashionable and trendy clothes, electric applications. As a result, those items might quickly become garbage when they no longer are new and eye-catching enough.
However, there are some actions that could help tackle these problems. First, raising people’s awareness about environmentalism through campaigns, lessons by local authorities can play a critical role. Residents are willing to minimize their home rubbish when they understand the importance of environmental protection. Second, media companies should create contents or innovations associated with both friendly environmental items and simplicial lifestyles rather than those related to consumerism. When it comes to trendency , each person will actively reuse, reduce and recycle their domestic waste. Moreover, the government could introduce environmental laws or taxes to citizens, aiming to limit the number of household trash.
In conclusion, people are responsible for a significantly huge household waste because of their awareness and their lifestyles depended on the tendency of advertising. Those numbers of domestic waste will increase unless people attempt to restrict their waste such as taking 3-R methods and caring about global problems.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-05-15 Lunar Tran 67 view
2022-05-15 Lunar Tran 84 view
Essays by user Lunar Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g instead of cavans when shopping. Thus, they find those kinds more convenient th...
^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... consumerism. When it comes to trendency , each person will actively reuse, reduce...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63914373089 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9419578519 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599388379205 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6565981457 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105670261571 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338796120872 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392597471464 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733195832554 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384027966392 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.