Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones. Which types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Some believe that there are types of old buildings deserve to be conserved while others are not. This essay will explain why buildings possessing both architecteral and practical values should be remained, and the merits of old buildings protection are overshadowed by the drawbacks.
There are buildings erected with unique designs which contribute to the facade of certain neighborhood. This not only makes up the aesthetic cityscape but also attracts visitors, generates more income for local inhabitants. Additionally, some buldings are still playing important role in accommodating people are worth the budget for preservation. One case in point is Vietnamese opera house, which is being harnessed to house audience of musical events. The expenditure to maintain such buildings are often lower than the cost of demolition and construct new ones that justifies the conservation of them.
One the one hand, there are ancient buildings that are synonymus with local history and culture. These buildings can be utilized as exhibitions sites of past events and relics of particular regions, creating tourist attractions. The more visitors come to the spots, the more income are generated to compensate for their existence. On the other hand, many buildings constructed in the past are unable to withstand the test of time. High maintenance and management cost rendering sustaining those building are futile. Constructions of new buildings with up-to-date designs, and state-of-the-art technologies are more worthwhile than squandering on preservation of the buildings.
In sum, architecture and application are two important factors should be taken into account to consider certain building are worth remaining or not. I concur with the view the downsides of keeping old buildings eclipse the merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ould be remained, and the merits of old buildings protection are overshadowed by the draw...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59854014599 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0777309726 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613138686131 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4479578617 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.266666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409101503733 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121099904737 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666639004849 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235959350262 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517982768976 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.