Some people think that children should aim to do their best at whatever they are doing. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is sometimes argued that children should make the best efforts on doing everything. While I accept that children can benefit from it, I still believe that it brings more negative impacts than beneficial ones on children.
Trying their best to do whatever in life can bring children several merits. Initially, perhaps it plays a crucial role in developing children’s personal skills. Putting effort in everything can make kids have a sense of competitive, which can help them face with challenges better in the fast-paced life. In addition, it can be considered a motivation for children to archieve their personal and professional goals. For instance, children who aim to do everything at the best results tend to have more knowledge due to their efforts to explore new things.
On the other hand, doing everything to gain best results can also have detrimental effects on children. One of the most negative impacts is put children under pressure. Children can feel that they need to do everything well, leading to self-doubt as well as metal and physical fatigue in long term. Moreover, holding this opinion can make children feel hard to accept the truth when they do not get the first place. It can take a long time for children to overcome their failure and take steps for the future plans.
In conclusion, it is true that children can gain numerous benefits for their growth from trying their best to do everything; however, it I believe that its harmful impacts is likely outweight its beneficial ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | daikhanhs | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | daikhanhs | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The diagram illustrates the process of making carbonated drinks 78
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98031496063 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64600028394 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9139411775 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3076923077 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253899939857 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109554076274 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728783739933 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166338520813 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026369633305 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98031496063 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64600028394 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9139411775 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3076923077 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253899939857 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109554076274 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728783739933 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166338520813 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026369633305 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.