Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others, however, believe that it is the only way to save such traditions.
Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
It is commonly thought that cultural traditions are ruined when people use them to make money from tourists whereas others argue that using these traditions as money-making ventures is the only way to save them. I personally opine that both views are true to a certain extent.
On the one hand, conventional cultures could be wrecked for several reasons. To begin with, uncontrolled mass tourism may damage cultural heritage sites irreversibly, which could create challenges from wear. For example, the construction of large hotels near Angkor Wat, which is a world-famous Cambodian tourist attraction, could affect the water table beneath tempers. Moreover, Hoi An in Vietnam, attracts a massive influx of travelers on an anual basis. Thus, a great number of local people are forced to move from the town’s centre to live on the outskirts. Therefore, ancient monuments tend to be vandalized by degrees.
On the other hand, the opinion that monetizing from folk cultures is the only way to preserve them also shows some remarkable reasons. First of all, the increasing number of visitors could provide funds for the preservation of such traditions. To exemplify, numerous people in Bat Trang village in Vietnam make their living from selling traditional ceramic products, and thus are able to continue one of the most long-standing crafts in Vietnam. Second, by putting cultural traditions on public display, the government could heighten people’s awareness of restoring national folklore. To illustrate, the Vietnamese government has built several museums that solely exhibit examples of ethnic minority cultures in an attempt to protect cultural values without affecting the lives of these people, yet successfully gathering lots of public attention and support.
In a nutshell, using historic cultures as commercial attractions has both positive and negative impacts on the conservation of such traditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-17 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | khushboo choudhary | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-10 | gur1040894 | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-19 | Vu Khanh | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Fay Phan Nguyen | 87 | view |
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others however believe that it is the only way to save such traditions Discuss both views and give your own opinions 89
- Some people say that students should go to single sex schools while others say that this may worsen gender equality and even their study Discuss both views and give your own opinions 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th views are true to a certain extent. On the one hand, conventional cultures c...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... great number of local people are forced to move from the town’s centre to live o...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents tend to be vandalized by degrees. On the other hand, the opinion that mone...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al values without affecting the lives of these people, yet successfully gathering...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lots of public attention and support. In a nutshell, using historic cultures a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47635135135 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88251312909 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641891891892 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7581084287 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285567328322 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830761089834 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869394904765 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184178787625 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108110320083 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.