Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe that is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
With the flourishing and innovation of technology, most people overuse cutting-edge devices on a daily basis, and pay less attention to traditional customs. As a result, today this becomes a pressing issue that grabs citizens' attention. While those opine that tourism is a good way to protect cultural heritage, others protest because they think this solution may ruin the prestigious cultural value. This essay will shed light on both views before making a final note.
It is not difficult to figure out why some people oppose that cultural tradition being used as a tool to attract tourists' attention, which will preserve cultural values. The first advantage is that if the local government launches a campaign to make places of interest become common for residents, they will concern and visit these destinations. Therefore, the government can introduce some programs associated with culture in order to raise residents’ awareness about saving and thriving cultural customs. The second lies in the more they witness the depletion of traditional worth, the more they will consider thoroughly with the aim to discover the original causes. Step by step, they will have been equipped with general cognition, thereby adjusting their behaviors to make contributions to addressing this current problem.
On the other hand, this approach also leads to some adverse effects that we need to consider. First and foremost, traditional values may be demolished by part of visitors due to their negative pattern behaviors. This is because they do not have comprehensive knowledge about their actions. For instance, dumping waste or signing on memorial statues is one of the most popular activities in well-known historical constructions. Another reason is that the managers of these places may ignore or avoid punishing customers for business purposes. Furthermore, they may splurge a huge amount of budget so as to modify the original nature with the aim of satisfying visitors’ tastes.
In conclusion, despite building up the wide range of tourist destinations playing a vital role to preserve worthwhile traditional values, I hold a belief that the authorities have to take measures to refrain from the negative effects.
- The table shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 89
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 78
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- The table shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 73
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hey may splurge a huge amount of budget so as to modify the original nature with the aim...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40229885057 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86596120881 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6803160134 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280380040839 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760997718143 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537334334267 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143618929676 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613303105611 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.