Some people think that detailed crime reports on newspapers and TV can have many disadvantages. To what extent do you agree/disagree?
Opinions diverge on whether publishing crime records on multiple media platforms brings multiple dislocations. In my judgement, I lean forward the opposition albeit several advocates.
Admittedly, declaring criminal malfeasance for the public through newspapers and TV can not only ensure the safety for the city dwellers but also help the governments identify the wanted criminal. To be more accurate, the citizens can depend on the criminal records on media platforms to be aware whether any crimes surround them so that they can avoid being assaulted. Furthermore, the governments can also gain benefits from this step now that they have another force who are the citizens for catching criminals which exert to the plummet in crime rate. This can be explained by the fact that the government can nudge the city dwellers towards reporting crimes at the expense of certain awards or money.
Further and even more prominently, indicating crime records on various platforms can also contribute to the slump of the criminal wave in the future. Now that these reports can be taken as an exemplary lesson for children about the consequences of committing an offence and doing illegal activities. As a result, children’s cognition will be fixed in an auspicious way of thinking that can avoid them falling into criminal activities. Therefore, the rate of crimes is exposed to slump exponentially in the future.
To sum up, besides many disadvantages of showing criminal records to the public, there is no denying that this action can bring numerous merits for citizens and governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | quan12341234 | 81 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 73
- The bar chart illustrates the number of people in the UK eating more than 5 portions of vegetables and fish per day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Task 1 The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an auspicious way" with adverb for "auspicious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ult, children’s cognition will be fixed in an auspicious way of thinking that can avoid them falling...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Therefore, the rate of crimes is exposed to slump exponentially in the future. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28458498024 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86232604222 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596837944664 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9593982339 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.545454545 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17565642129 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657818416324 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300429546409 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932457287105 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435737858784 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.