Some people think that employers should not be concerned about how employees dress at work, but the quality of work only. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, dressing professionally is a point of argument among people and the majority of society believes personnel’s outfits in the workspace have nothing to do with the employer and recruiters should be just focused on their staffs’ work qualification indications. I disagree entirely with this idea and I believe although staff maybe sometimes annoyed by wearing business professional attire, it could benefit businesses and organizations in many aspects.
I think the staff in some organizations should wear special clothes, and preferably uniform, for various reasons. Firstly, you never get a chance for making a good first impression again and on some occasions, especially if you are working in a trading office, clients will be unpleasant to see a person wearing casual attire and it is crucial to come off as professional and confident as possible. Secondly, in some organizations wearing a uniform with special decoration, is not only essential for being organized but also an indication of the person's job status and hierarchy in the system. For example, my father has been working in military service for more than 20 years and one of his unforgettable memories is about a day he was on a mission and he used the wrong decoration that as a consequence, the security guard was reluctant to allow him to enter the military site. Finally, recent studies proved that dressing appropriately not only impacts your self-confidence but also influences the image that upper-level managers have of you and gives you a competitive edge over others, and affects your promotion potential.
Moreover, in some dangerous working environments, special attention should be taken for considering every caution and risk so obeying the company’s overall dress code is pivotal. For example, at a drilling site drilling crews are always exposed to many dangers such as smelling poisonous gases and fire and they must adhere to safety standards. So, HSE engineers in the yard must ensure safety for everyone and they always check whether staffs wear flame-resistant clothes, safety goggles, and hamlets.
To sum up, I do believe although a one-size-fits-all dress code seems traditional, it is really important to consider a high level of formality in choosing your work outfit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | Roy An | 96 | view |
| 2022-05-10 | kamelelahe | 95 | view |
| 2022-05-10 | kamelelahe | 89 | view |
- Some people think that employers should not be concerned about how employees dress at work but the quality of work only To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people feel that it will be better for society and individuals if driverless cars are widely used Others are not in the favour of the same Discuss both the point of views and give your opinion 89
- The two maps below show an island before and after construction of some tourist facilities
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes while others think one can t be judged on the basis of one s clothes Discuss both the views and give your opinion 89
- Early schooling has been always a point of dispute among people While a relatively large proportion of society thinks formal studies ought to be started in the early years I believe compulsory school for children below 7 years old is a wrong idea On the o 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28650137741 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09474430968 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625344352617 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1379936805 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.454545455 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2286647934 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805999104962 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541502365832 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122324708453 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326228657252 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.