Some people think that employers should not be concerned about how employees dress at work, but the quality of work only. To what extent do you agree or disagree
There has always been a debate throughout various fields about the importance of a dress code for members, especially in the professional industry, where employees' actions and speeches are a significant part of the enterprise's image. Many believe that the need for intervention on the administration level of their workers' clothing is oblivious, while others suggest the opposite. In my opinion, I agree with the latter statement on account of the positive personas it brings to the firms in the public's eyes and the uniform essence encapsulating the entire company a universal, formal dressing will attain, all of which shall be further in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the first benefit formatted clothes can achieve is a sense of unity in the organization. People's tendencies to discriminate and gossip based on the garments of others are rife in the workplace, leading to impacts that have persistently reared their ugly heads on one's mentality and esteem as individuals fatigued themselves with the constant demand to catch up with the norm to avoid isolation. The exhaustion from these incidents will not only lower productivity but can also lead to severe consequences on the harmony and cooperation of the corporation. As such, a standardized attiring system will avoid the nuisance and paltriness of this issue for jobholders, effectively raising the quality of their work and the working environment.
In addition, an establishment's values and standards are more often than not assessed by the population through the behaviours and manners of the associates, as the employees are often a reflection of their employers. Because of this, it is of great importance for institutions to put heavy emphasis on their subordinates' looks to create a formal impression on outsiders. Additionally, comfort-based apparel can create awkward and negative interactions in a conventional ambience, particularly during a meeting, for both the customers and colleagues. Hence, it is a cardinal necessity to exist the installation of requirements of ceremonial uniforms for organizational members in order to enhance the picture of the business.
In conclusion, a ubiquitous sense of dress is crucial for the upbringing of a productive and conducive work setting and should be the numero uno priority in the business industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | Roy An | 96 | view |
| 2022-05-10 | kamelelahe | 95 | view |
| 2022-05-10 | kamelelahe | 89 | view |
- Petroleum is the dominant fuel source for various vehicles nowadays Therefore a rise in its price is often suggested to reduce the growing number of conveyances on the road However although such intervention can have some effect on the problem in my opini 95
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news programs Agree or disagree 82
- In recent years advocating for the decrease of pollution imprints was critical among which is for cycling as a commuting method because of its unpopularity despite the positive impacts on the environment it brings to the table In the following paragraphs
- Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people who would normally never have the chance to meet to communicate What are the advantages of international communication online Ar 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40547945205 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2565029417 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605479452055 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8791601815 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.416666667 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4166666667 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123647188688 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385633984824 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479459520539 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781835785367 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452667538691 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.