Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Environment defines as natural surrounding of human, which comprises air, water, soil, plants and other essential natural resources. It has been dilapidated drastically by the activities of human such as industrialization and so on, but this alarming situation can be curtailed with proper initiatives from both people and government. Therefore, as per requirement of statement, I am going to shed my knowledge over both the views.
To begin with, people have more responsibility as compare to government because they are the one, who exploit the environment in some form or the other, therefore people should take care of environment due to multiple reasons. Firstly, consumption of excessive resources unnecessary by human to fulfill their greedy needs make environment on a degradation stage which in turn create the problem for all the living creatures because forests are cutting on widespread scale for urbanization, as a result temperature is increasing which ultimately breeds many fatal ailments, so this negative development should mitigate. Secondly, emission of toxic gases from vehicles result tremendous damage of environment in the form of climate change, acid rain and many more, hence people should use public vehicles as an alternative to keep environment safe. For instance, Sweden is the cleanest country of the world because people use public transport on wide range.
However, government can play a dramatic role in conserving environment along with people in a multifarious ways. First, government can impose stringent laws and remove lax regulations for the industries and the use of vehicles which emit huge harmful gases and smoke. Secondly, government can aware people about the aftermath of damaging environment thereby people will be meticulous for saving their environment. Thirdly, government should promote organic farming so that use of fertilizers and pesticides could be reduced to a greater extent. For instance, soil fertility is imperative for cultivation of crops as well as for crop's rotation.
In conclusion, I opine that mindset of people needs to be changed towards environment for ensuring healthy life for upcoming generation, and it can be feasible by the initiatives of government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, as a result temperature is increasing which ultimately breeds many fatal ailme...
^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...ent along with people in a multifarious ways. First, government can impose stringent...
^^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs changed" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'changing' or 'to be changed'.
Suggestion: changing; to be changed
...n, I opine that mindset of people needs changed towards environment for ensuring health...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.3376753507 348% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59467455621 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07477878173 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.6517030222 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.461538462 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8461538462 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148899241439 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526318265519 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285364578592 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833009153818 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335021266801 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.