Some people think that good teamwork is what makes a company successful, while others think good leadership is the reason for a company’s success. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about what determines a company’s success. Although strong teamwork benefits an organisation in many regards, I believe that effective leadership is the driving force behind every company’s success.
There are two chief reasons why some people attach utmost importance to close teamwork. Firstly, it is considered to be of great help in case of organisational challenges and obstacles, as different people can come up with different creative ideas and solutions to overcome problems. A single leader, on the contrary, might find it difficult to look at every situation from different perspectives and solve diverse problems, regardless of their superb problem-solving skills. Secondly, when people work collaboratively, they can create a friendly working environment. This, in turn, may boost job satisfaction and positively affect employee productivity. Given these arguments, it is hardly surprising why so many enterprises are generating various ways to promote collaboration in the workplace.
I, however, would argue that a good leader is way more important as far as a company’s success is concerned. For a start, good leadership brings people together and develops a sense of shared purpose. Without effective leaders who can teach employees how to perform co-operatively, any concerns about a collaborative job environment become irrelevant. Furthermore, a great leader can make wise decisions and implement a few feasible ideas for their company to blossom. Workers, on the other hand, struggle to reach a conclusion and apply their ideas in practice, despite being able to produce a variety of plans. Because of these crucial factors, I take issue with the idea that leadership is greater than teamwork.
Though there are some decided benefits of outstanding teamwork, including better problim-solving and a friendly job environment, on the whole, great leadership is much more significant since it builds collaboration and puts different ideas into practice.
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people think that good teamwork is what makes a company successful while others think good leadership is the reason for a company s success Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Global warming is one of the most serious issue that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, as for, on the contrary, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66556291391 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23715932164 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655629139073 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.143056478 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.066666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221039341876 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761582322376 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787645363794 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139054883023 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899155872435 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.