Some people think that the government should make laws regarding nutrition and a healthy lifestyle, while others think that it is a matter of personal choice and personal responsibility. Discuss both views and opinion
There are proposed that the modern sedentary lifestyle is increasing of the population, which is causing more ailment such as obesity, diabetes with these are extremely effects to our lives. This may be a deficit to the health budgets so that the government is encouraging the dwellers into prompting to health-food consumed. Nevertheless, many people have the contrast thinking to these ideals, what are people who should be freely decided on own interest and are belongs to personal responsibilities. Looking from an overall perspective, this essay will discuss both opinions.
In terms of the regulations of the government are in providing nutrition and healthy diet towards the entire of health-population. Indeed, the government are gradually imposed a high tax on these products, which is mean that they would have probably turned into a person who has a good physical condition by ingesting more vegetable, organic products. Similarly, children have also mindful of daily meals, by highly eating nutrition’s once a day. By doing this, it will be conceived of as a habit they consume. In the day to come, these are not under the pressure to the government policy about how to be changing of unhealthy of residents.
On the other hand, a healthy lifestyle should be left to the individuals about what they are eating day-to-day. In particular, the government should be just raised awareness of individuals what the detrimental of unhealthy habits within existing of our lives. With the plenty of methods as it is such as constructs more the centre sports or the scheme are persuading many people should be followed to a health routine or are motivated go there very often. However, whether the administration is trying or is doing anyways, they need to respect of person’s preferences.
In conclusion, government interference is needed more than ever, it made good health to people and is preventing the consequences of these habits later on. Eventually, people will be getting more benefits from complying with these matters.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, well, in conclusion, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21276595745 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04396330838 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550151975684 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.840259688 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17293294237 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561983437913 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419787524934 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104178291541 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036441431265 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.