Some People Think That Mobile Phones Should Be Banned In Public Places Like Libraries, Shops And On Public Transport. To What Extent Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Statement?
Some debated that electronic device should be prohibited in public areas such as libraries centre or transportation system on the ground. This may be considered disturbances from notification or bright screen. From my perspective, smart mobile should be widely allowed in public facilities.
On the one hand, allowing mobile phones might assist travellers, customer and learners in public areas. In fact that some risks occur to visitors experience in the shortage of employees without any assistance or containing viruses in the transmission of money during the outbreak. In these cases, mobile phones are being accessed to the Internet which could be addressed anything goes wrong immediately such as look for essential information are being not to lose the road or scan QR code to reduces infection in the community. Instead of borrowing books in the library, the learner is being approached with a huge of knowledge available on the mobile platform without going anyplace.
On the other hand, mobile phone is multi-functional that permits turn to silent or vibrate, in some cases, it may be licensed to use in an emergency such as an accident in public places. First of all, it undeniable that sometimes caused annoying to others with ringtone or messages notification. As is mentioned, it is a sudden accident, mobile will easily get in touch with the whole family wherever they are.
In conclusion, mobile phones are invented which uses judiciously, wisely but it should be restricted by rule frame as well as respect to others in public areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92421278435 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3062616512 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.909090909 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289353066368 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107789486989 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600474150366 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17931248183 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474403983694 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.