Some people think the government should spend money to look for life on other planets, others think it is a waste of public money, because there are other problems unsolved on earth.
Discuss both view and give your own opinion .
These days, many countries are spending large amounts of money exploring the universe and searching extra-terrestrial life. While these explorations may be beneficial to some extent, I would argue that addressing existing problems of the society such as extreme poverty, famine, abysmal healthcare should be the priority when allocating national budget.
On the one hand, the human race has long been eager to find the existence of life beyond the Earth. This is primarily because of the fear that some day, our planet may become uninhabitable with contagious diseases and global warming causing constant natural disasters. Should it happen, a new liveable planet will be the only chance for humans to survive. Apart from this, many technological inventions developed for these explorations can find various civilian applications, benefiting the life of humans on Earth. For example, the artificial satellites invented for space explorations can also be used to make weather predictions, allowing farmers to proactively deal with storms or drought to avoid crop losses.
On the other hand, I believe that solving humanitarian problems that people on Earth are facing is a more urgent mission. It is because the Earth is certainly the only home for humankind for the time being, which we should take care of before making efforts to find another one. Everyday, millions of people are dying due to long-term poverty, diseases and pollutions, which raises a call for investment in finding solutions to address. Therefore, instead of pouring billions of dollars into space exploration programs, developed nations should first come up with solutions and provide aid for low income countries to save them from diseases, hunger and poverty.
To conclude, it seems to me that governments should firstly prioritize people’s welfare by addressing social and economic problems before finding life in other planets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-28 | perry1812 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | Khanhu010101 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small commun 73
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 56
- Many young people leave school with negative attitudes towards learning Why What can be done to encourage a positive attitude to learning in young people 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
...ore making efforts to find another one. Everyday, millions of people are dying due to lo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43434343434 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84486879551 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643097643098 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4328184927 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210744241958 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778443458359 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483159740401 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130498757917 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362573641764 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.