The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies
in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts how Outokumpu enterprise’s share price in euros changed from the beginning of 2006 to the end of 2010.
Overall, it is clear that although the share price of Outokumpu company experienced some periods of dramatic fluctuations, the overal figure remained almost unchanged over the period of 5 years.
In January of 2006, the company’s share price stood at around 13 euros, which surged up to over 30 euros by the end of this year. During the next year, despite some sudden rise, the general figure declined by approximately 10 euros, reaching about 21 euros in December of 2007.
Although the share price then went up to 30 euros in few beginning months of the year 2008, it considerably dropped to its bottom of only 7 euros in the December. During the following year, the figure underwent a recovery to 15 euros in the first half, which then went down to about 11 euros by the end. A similar pattern can be seen in 2010, after recovering to about 17 euros, the share price ended the year at just over 12 euros.
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 83
- It is widely believed that children of different levels of intelligence should be taught together while others thin that more intelligent children should be taught separately Discuss and present your own opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64324324324 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51954521851 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572972972973 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.360679775 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219162150367 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117497482344 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860610266197 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161644183 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870863096525 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.