Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that spending money on the arts is pointless, and this money could be better spent elsewhere. Personally, I partly disagree with this statement because arts are an integral part of any culture.
On the one hand, the argument that investing money on art is reasonable to some extent. The first reason is that there are many artitic endeavours are costly and do not have any direct effect on country's income. For exampl, statue "Giant elephant" in Viet Nam, which costs one billion VND due to the huge expenses of building and maintenance costs, attract no attention. The second reason is that arts is not essential for humans. Human would not die because of lack aesthetic taste. Therefore, more attention could be paid to other fields such as education or economic rather than to arts.
Despite the above, I contend that the government should expenditure on arts. This is because arts contribute to express the national identity. Many museums display cultural heritages which contain information related to the nation's history. Therefore, people can gain a deeper understanding about culture diversity. Furthermore, these museums can attract attention from foreign tourists, resulting in increasing countries's income from tourism. For instance, museum "Nhà tù Hoả Lò" in Viet Nam attracts around millions of tourists per year, contributing to accelerate tourist's understanding about Viet Nam's culture and create more job opportunities for local people.
In conclusion, while some maintain that it is not advisable to invest money in arts, I believe that arts should be funded by governments since it can help to improve tourism industry and increase appreciation of culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Van123321 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | preetir160 | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-21 | annie99 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | Uppal singh | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-17 | Charlotte_Giang_VN | 87 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...hich contain information related to the nations history. Therefore, people can gain a d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4037037037 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85329689219 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.481294757 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235167507441 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777351837265 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103033121047 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157274011825 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963153365355 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.