Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Recently the phenomenon has aroused much concern that instead of the fact that the government is squandering money for arts, money benefits a plethora of works. I totally agree that there are a great deals of better things the government can be using money for.
There are a lot of reasons to elucidate this deal, numerous citizens are in poverty, they need to take support from charity institutions and the government. Particularly in near-oceaned countries such as Vietnam, there is a need for a large supporting resource because it is viable to get a lot of disasters. As an evidence, in the nearest month, countless people in The Central Coast of Vietnam have always been stuck in consecutive tropical storms which caused the worst floods and landslides in the past 100 years and harming the possession of people a lot. Nevertheless, not all the people have been capitalized on the government disaster supporting budgets. Under all of their loss, the government has to establish a charity finance for building the flexible houses in flood.
The second reason is that art and music can develop as hobbies, and saving money instead of wasting for art can be directed towards urgent needs of society. In history, people receive a great number of panic issues and can not have speculation such as pandemic. Let’s take Covid-19 as a typical example, which is more severe pandemic than ever, abundant countries have to make a lockage therefore people can not make money for buying food therefore the government has to make a subsidy of food for people. Unlike the previous pandemic, Covid-19 lasts for a long period, a lot of countries are having insufficient budgets for buying food for people. Thus, for crucial circumstances, the government has to prepare a large financial resource for foresighting serious problems such as poverty.
In brief, the nation has a large amount of crucial issues, which may not foresight, reserving money for art for it is what the government has to do in the early time.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, in brief, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95845697329 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75875356557 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522255192878 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2501559249 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21922031534 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085622378962 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580049510831 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15301622489 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048064110827 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.