Traffic on roads has become a problem in nearly every country in the world.
What can be done to reduce the amount of traffic at a society level and at an individual level?
One of the highly discussed problems of modern society is the undisturbed growth of traffic on roads, especially in developed countries and bigger cities. In my opinion, the root of this problem lies in the lack of investments made in the public transport's system that should be modenised and improved.
Every city, either smaller or bigger ones, are equipped with a system of public transport which is often the cause of major traffic issues for a number of different reasons. One of them is that these systems are often outdated in many cities. It means that fundamental resources such as public buses or underground lack of working stability, for example, scheduled times of transit. People, therefore, prefer to drive their personal cars and get stuck into traffic jams and not risking to wait long for a bus. Another reason is that some convoys are very old and do not offer citizens hazard-free rides. One good illustration of this is a large number of buses which caught fire in Rome during the last year. As a result, public transport is the least chosen transport method used by the Romans.
A reform of mass transportation could alleviate many of the problems that countries are facing but would require joint efforts from the government and individuals. If larger funds were invested in both technical and efficiency improvements, the choice to travel using urban transportation methods could be easier for lots of people. Meanwhile, individuals should opt for more sustainable choices, such as riding a bike or walking when possible. The idea of carpooling should be supported more as it reduces significantly traffic on roads.
In conclusion, the solutions to reduce heavy traffic from cities may vary but they necessarily require cooperation from both public administration and individuals. In my opinion, it is a problem that can be improved by boosting public transportation systems and giving public credit when it actively betters the situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transports'' or 'transport's'?
Suggestion: transports'; transport's
... lack of investments made in the public transports system that should be modenised and imp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 637, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rides. One good illustration of this is a large number of buses which caught fire in Rome during ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 759, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to transport'
Suggestion: to transport
...t, public transport is the least chosen transport method used by the Romans. A reform of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... of carpooling should be supported more as it reduces significantly traffic on roa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.153125 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87431887312 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.437437435 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137364025198 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456224202055 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453776400145 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943978350274 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320220962709 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.