Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinions differ as to whether artists should receive financial assistance from the governments or they should be supported by other funding sources. I believe art creators should be assisted by alternative funds.
It is understandable why some people think that the authorities should spend their budget to support painters and musicians. One reason is that a majority of nowadays artists are living in poverty. A support from governments, therefore, would be of significant help to improve these art creators’ monthly income which impacts directly on their productiveness. In Vietnam, for example, a large number of artistic creations has been introduced to the public since the commitment of monthly funding to genuine artists was signed by the national assembly in 2015. Another reason is the equitable distribution of students in art majors would be greatly raised. When people know they are secured with a stable paycheck in artistic occupations, they will consider studying art subjects in formal education.
However, I would side with those who think that artists should fund their own projects with other money sources. One reason to support my standpoint on this matter is that the freedom of publicizing would likely be restricted when receiving money from the governments. Taking budget from the authority means that the creators of art are not allowed to freely publish their precious works without permissions. Thus, refusing national aid and considering alternative sources of money would leave their activity to no boundaries. Furthermore, there are various methods to gain money through making arts. For instance, painters could still make a living by tutoring other people who are interested in drawing.
In conclusion, I would say that artists should consider other sources instead of governments’ fund due to some detriments. Either one accepts financial aid from the authority or finds his own way, making money is still a key to encouraging his creativity.
- In some countries, online shopping is now replacing shopping in stores. Do you think it is a negative or positive development? 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since the computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 47
- Technology has affected people in mostly negative ways. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- A friend you met last year has invited you to visit him/her in his/her country. You have never been there before and need some information before you leave.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:•request advise about a gift for his/her family•a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...and give your opinion. Opinions differ as to whether artists should receive financial assist...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 391, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...roductiveness. In Vietnam, for example, a large number of artistic creations has been introduced ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48115942029 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90877327799 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3714171092 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5263157895 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1578947368 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496434233602 0.244688304435 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170452667588 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190717935722 0.0667982634062 286% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.369675214147 0.151304729494 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.327516883107 0.056905535591 576% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.