Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Mankind has stepped into a new era where communication becomes more and more important. Thus, scientists predict that one language will become native for people around the world. In my opinion, while it is convenient to help people easily communicate, using only one language is not ideally positive.
On the one hand, speaking one language can help to create better connections. For the countries, this helps the governments to negotiate more easily with other nations. By direct understanding without any translations, representatives of a country can reduce their time to make decisions in future international conferences. For the people, speaking one language will help when they want to have conversation everywhere in the world. For example, when foreign tourists come to visit other countries, they will find it easier to talk to local people because they know their language is being used natively worldwide.
On the other hand, there will be some problems if all nations want to speak one language. The first issue is that what language will be chosen to be official among the others. Such issue will not have the solution any time soon because every country wants their language to be known worldwide. Thus, this will finally lead to disagreements or even conflicts between nations. The second problem is that when speaking one language for a long time, people will forget their own languages after a few generations. In addition, each language is unique and represents each country’s culture. Therefore, the world’s diversity of cultures could be endangered in the future.
In conclusion, if the prediction of the scientists does happen in the future, I believe there will be more negative effects than positive ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | My Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
- Some people think it is more important to spend time in developing a successful career while others think it is more important to spend time with friends and family. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 89
- in recent years, farming practice has changed to include methods such as farming factory and the use of technology to improve crops. some people believe these developments are necessary, while others regard them as dangerous and advocate a return to more 78
- You have just returned from holiday and were not satisfied with your trip. Write to the travel agency. In your letterSay where / when you went on holidayExplain why you are not satisfied with your holidayTell them what you would like them to do 73
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- You recently went on a trip with a friend and you both took some photographs.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:•ask your friend to send you one of the photographs•explain why you need that particular photograph•and tell your friend what 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2688172043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88661116038 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5770609319 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3829079212 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128032416429 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483785421256 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431140769765 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907666214569 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403617545255 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.