Some people think having more TV channels is good because they will have more choices. While other people think too many TV channels only lead to a lot of poor quality TV programs. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
With the augmentation and progression of communities, the variations of the level of expectation and desideratum of human-being severely are escalating. Without a shadow dubiety, one of them is nothing but having the miscellaneous and vivid TV channels. In this way, persons can freely go for a channel and follow programs having the penchant for. To what extent, I agree with the former opinion, notwithstanding it might cause an adverse effect. In the following, both facets will be discussed succinctly.
On the one hand, those who are the proponent of this notion opine the increase of channels highly likely will be suitable due to having arbitrarily lots of choices among a potpourri of different items. To further address this issue, finding a channel tedious and boring, they can immediately change it. Moreover, should the number of channels increase, the diversity of programs will considerably wax. To this end, the fulfillment of the idea tends to be fanciful.
One the other hand, those who are the opponent to this idea maintain the more TV channel leads to the remarkable downturn of the quality of the programs. First and foremost, as long as a cornucopia program produces then the share of pecuniary advantage probably would be infinitesimal for each program, giving rise to dwindle of the quality. On top of that, the lion’s share majority of the times all producers to fill their conductor are coerced to deem what is extraneous to the line of the goal of the channel. As a result, the more TV channel establishes, the low qualified programs are showed.
To recapitulate briefly, who insist on having more channels declare they can select without any circumscription and always watch their desired programs. Nonetheless, the adversaries vow the quality of the program directly subject to fiscal measurements; additionally, producers more often than not are not able to present germane programs, according to the policy of their channel.
- The first chart below shows then umber of airline crew pilots stewards etc needed to fly a passenger plane between Australia and a number of other countries The second chart shows the number of passenger complaints per plane journey made on these routes a 81
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs.Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 100
- Should Government spend money on art when they have so many other important issues? 61
- Some feel executives in large companies should receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some say that people working in different job roles should get different amounts of holiday time. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, as a result, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18553459119 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99163059969 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.485201352 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281564016173 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884495518355 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606539520282 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159659218335 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370372406905 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.