Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are some people believe that history has limited relevance to temporary people, while others concur with the view that past events can foster people's comprehension of the present. This essay will elaborate on both viewpoints and explain why the role of history is of great importance.
On the one hand, the emergency of history in the stream of human's civilization is obscure. While other realms such as mathematics marks its independent account for the flourishment of humans, history as a domain often engulfs other subjects such as archeology, architecture, and literature, rendering the contribution of history less significant than it should be. Additionally, the study of history is not lucrative, which impedes attendance of people to the field. This makes the public less aware of achievement in the study of past events. People thereby being unable to notice the position of history in the success of humanity in many aspects of life.
On the other hand, history has benefited society in many dimensions. The first merit could be witnessed in agriculture. It is obvious that the experience of crop cultivation is accumulated since the dawn of men's civilization. Without the valuable lessons of ancestors, humans may be unable to either effectively raise livestock or maintain soil fertility, which spell trouble for the survival of humanity. Furthermore, learning history acts as a precaution ensuring safety of humans. One of foremost application of history is the research of climate change relied on records from the past. The collected data enables present scientists to weigh against the negative implications of the weather and find more practical resolutions for unexpected catastropic events in years to come.
In sum, history plays an important role in the flourishment of humans in general. Even though its position is eclipsed by other subjects and restricted awareness of people, historical affects could be seen in other fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | Xaxaxaxa | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | adamneyul | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-20 | 지아 진 | 84 | view |
- Machines are replacing humans in the manual workforce Do you think the positive effects outweigh the negative effects 90
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 47
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and g 84
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iety in many dimensions. The first merit could be witnessed in agriculture. It is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37540453074 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9656269989 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595469255663 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6350363622 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234618326807 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746966005799 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597890456187 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148938295396 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688446754441 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.