Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is appreciated that the effort to protect wild animals is costly and time-consuming, and it could have been better contributed to human beings. From my perspective, I truly agree with this statement.
There are several drawbacks of allocating time and budget to saving wild animals in terms of their potential threats to humans and waste of money. Initially, an overwhelming danger is that wild animal can carry diseases dangerous or fatal to humans. This is derived from the fact that wild species, such as tigers, are found to harbour parasites, such as intestinal worms and protozoa, which can be transmitted to humans through touching. Another dangerous factor is that wild animals can attack people by biting or scratching, resulting in unwanted injuries. Besides, in order to aid wild species with suitable social, nutritional, and psychological needs, a tremendous amount of expenditure is required.
By contrast, spending time and money on people can solve the urgent needs of upgrading transportation infrastructure and tackling adversely infectious diseases. To begin with, because transport ensures the everyday mobility of people and contributes to the production and distribution of goods, the transportation network is indispensable to the well-functioning of economic activities and assured of social well-being. Infectious illnesses, moreover, can be passed from individual to individual, even leading to hazardous pandemics, notably the Covid pandemic. Therefore, it is urgent to discover cures and vaccines for these diseases. Therefore, transportation systems and medical researches deserve more attention focus and financial resources.
In conclusion, as for acknowledging the demerits of wildlife conservation and the merits of caring and spending money on the human population, my verdict is that humans should be prioritized over protecting wild animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals health than consuming ready meals To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75714285714 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26889327836 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617857142857 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5617765326 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262964086094 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831911600432 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590690866946 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162801423267 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671750296547 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.