some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones in communication has negative effects on young peoples reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
From the perspective of some people, rising of computers and cell phones application will be led to diminish of reading and writing ability in young people. Although, there are some opposite view which believe that it is not true, but personally I agree with first group.
To begin with, the most important item which affects on communication skills is using stickers instead of words to express meaning. Indeed, the simplest and easiest way to answer by smart phones is using them that will lead to reduction of using words in conversations. For example, a lot of people for thanks, just send a sticker to avoid type words.
On the other hand, when you used a smart tool like computer, your writing fault will be corrected automaticly and you prefer to have this option. As a consequence, the correct way of words dictation will be unfamiliar for you. Moreover, to save time, most of people try to use abbreviation of some words which is limited to smart phones. For instance using u instead of you. Therefore it is another repercussion of this method of communication.
Nevertheless, I can understand why some people are against of clear effects of overusing computers and phones one reading and writing skills. Their opinion is based on changing conversation methods and appeals to easier way without writing complication and grammar rules.
In conclusion, the effect of using competers and phones on communication skills is obvious and it drastically will get worse without putting some barrier to control it.
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 61
- nowadays more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same job what problems this causes what are the solutions 78
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 73
- advantages and disadvantages of the use of organic foods 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: you're; you are
...en you used a smart tool like computer, your writing fault will be corrected automat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...miliar for you. Moreover, to save time, most of people try to use abbreviation of some words w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s. For instance using u instead of you. Therefore it is another repercussion of this meth...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03968253968 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83122058973 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.967441296 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6923076923 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30570853403 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979443830774 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670647299515 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16252883817 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238444039942 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.