The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Using the cigarette in the public places had been a controversial debates between people which finally led to creating rules for smoking prohibition in some places. Recently, the cellphone has faced the same situation and different attitudes are presented to application procedure of it either. I personally not agree to put rules in order to ban it like cigarette and describe why in this essay.
To begin with, it is obvious that almost each person has a cell phone nowadays and it is not comparable to cigarettes that belongs to special type of people which are in the minority. In the other words, the scope of using mobile is enormous and establish the rules for it is not logical.
As second reason, smoking in comparison with cellphones is drastically annoyed and unhealthy too and because of it a lot of appeals has been raised to limit using cigarette especially in public places that has direct effect on people which are unaccustomed with unintended consequence. This is an exaggeration to have the same approach about mobile phones that are just annoying occasionally. For instance, talking by cellphones when you are in public transportation vehicles such as bus or subway will be unpleased for others.
Finally, it is not possible to imagine the smoking as emergency task while it will occur about using cell phones hugely and it is inevitable, so establishing the strict obstacles against free using of it may led to a lot of difficulties and problems. For example, when you have to talk to someone and it is so urgent you cannot think about the position which you are, bus or other public places, it is not true in terms of smoking.
On the other hand, some people refer to some annoying items like the ringing tone, loud speaking and so on and they say that we should be banned it. Of course, it is not deniable that using cellphones will be annoyed sometimes, but respectfully putting the rules on it is imaginable.
In conclusion, I personally believe that it is not possible and fare to ban using cell phones. Although using the mobile phone in some cases may be annoyed, but it includes everyone and will happen for each person on occasion. Furthermore, the using of cell phones is some situation is compulsory and it is not comparable with smoking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-21 | tsln7607 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-21 | tsln7607 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-21 | tsln7607 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Phạm Phương Uyên | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | songuyen14 | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 73
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 61
- advantages and disadvantages of the use of organic foods 84
- advantages and disadvantages of the use of organic foods 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'debate'?
Suggestion: debate
... public places had been a controversial debates between people which finally led to cre...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[6]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will sometimes be annoyed
...t is not deniable that using cellphones will be annoyed sometimes, but respectfully putting the rules on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, may, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, in some cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80612244898 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7623251875 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47193877551 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.5916245529 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.6 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1333333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275321434386 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871226089608 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393274728649 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137346846461 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270694144269 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.