Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
As soaring private vehicle ownership and emissions the world over exacerbate the already deteriorating air quality, many suggest that countries should ban cars from circulating on certain days of the year. In this essay, I will demonstrate that such a policy is futile and that there exist more viable solutions to alleviate air pollution.
The chief argument in favor of car-free days is that they could contribute to a significant reduction in car emissions, which is one of the chief causes of pollution. In addition, by forcing citizens to resort to alternatives like mass transit on these days, governments may expect to foster an appreciation for and promote the use of eco-friendly modes of transport, which may reinforce the decrease in the amount of exhaust gas released. However, I believe car-free days are unlikely to produce the desired effects in many countries where driving cars is not the norm. For example, in much of Vietnam, scooters remain the vehicle of choice, and thus a ban on automobiles for a few days would have but a negligible effect on the overall level of carbon dioxide emission.
In my view, there are more viable solutions to the issue of air pollution. To curtail motor vehicle emissions, states could levy a higher tax on automobile imports to discourage people from buying cars. Such a tax has witnessed tremendous success in Singapore, where exorbitant imported car prices have incentivized commuters to use the sky train system, resulting in a cleaner atmosphere in the city. Because industrial activities are also to blame for pollution, another measure could be to introduce more stringent regulations regarding the discharge of toxic fumes of manufacturing firms. For example, a cap on steel plants' carbon emissions would deter steel companies from making profits at the expense of the environment.
In conclusion, it is my belief that car-free days would offer little benefit, and taxing car importers as well as curbing industrial gas discharge would more effectively address the underlying causes of pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-03 | minminnt | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | Gulinura | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | khanhngoc2307 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | loc nguyen | 84 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20481927711 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90638147416 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7507525943 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11621649507 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044992075195 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375024627734 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736042077034 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272568650954 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.