Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams e g football However some think that it is better to play individual games e g swimming etc Discuss both the views and give your opinion

The spirit of sports is to be higher, faster and stronger. People hold different opinions towards whether team sports or individual sports bring more good, I regard both of them can be helpful to individual physical development and the society.
Some people approve of group games for they can develop team spirit. Players need to communicate together and cooperate together for a shared team goal. No single person can win a football game or a hockey game independently. Even when we cheer for the one-hit run, the partner engages the personal joyfulness into the whole team. That is the definding moment for all players all. In this way, not only physical strengthen and team work are developed but also bonds and friendship are tied together. Team sports also
Others suggest that individual sports are more directly beneficial for personal physical development. For these games involve less people which may bear little relationship with coping with others, players can focus on their personal achievement and aim. For example, a new swimmer can practise by himself and make progress day by day. Compared with group activities, personal sports can be more effective.
In my view, both team and individual sports can make it all different when it comes to improve physical health. Given that today’s societies need not only physical capable people but the holistic development of people, a better way is to blend two approaches. People should be encouraged to parcitipate in team sports as well as faciliating their interests in individual ones, the justification of sports is to weave them together.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ship are tied together. Team sports also Others suggest that individual sports ar...
^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...al development. For these games involve less people which may bear little relationsh...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for example, as well as, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1724137931 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71490478744 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1938506738 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193205400708 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698812192515 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572060858892 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128700670789 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322393491902 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.