Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. But others think taking part in individual sports is better, like swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that people will gain more benefits when they engage in sports teams such as football. While others think that it is better to attend to individual sports. This essay will take a look at both sides of this argument.
First of all, team sports will enhance teamwork spirits. Therefore, it would be efficient when you apply it to works and projects. Instead of working passively in teamwork, they can take the opportunity to accelerate the process of working, thinking for groups more than themselves. For example, football is always allowed players to develop teamwork experiments by having lots of passing and support for those who are not good as others. Secondly, this would help some who are not good at communication and are unconfident and break the barriers. There is a key element to be leadership which is the most important skill in today’s world
However, individual sports will get some benefits including independence and endeavor. Players who play individually are not able to affect any opinion and they have to make their own decision. These force them to think about which is the best plan and don’t rely on anyone. In contrast, team sports always put majority opinion to the top and that makes some don’t have their own argument. Secondly, because of independence that makes people can’t have any support from others unless to some degree, rely on luck. They don’t have any choice apart from trying the best of their possibility. Therefore, if they want to play individual sports, they can’t be lazy or just rely on luck, it will all depend on your capability and your efforts spending on the sports. So it is no doubt that individual sports are fairer to team sports because of the personalized in each player.
In conclusion, both of these categories give some distinct benefits and it is hard to decide which is the better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | horae.zh | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | Nguyễn Ninh | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | dorae | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-26 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- With the fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think the newly built houses should be as same as the old house style in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build house in their own style Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 78
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that the be 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ngage in sports teams such as football. While others think that it is better to atten...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89308176101 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57250387669 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531446540881 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0694662589 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5294117647 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278216029802 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870065316923 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530555579581 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166296815954 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480353679511 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ngage in sports teams such as football. While others think that it is better to atten...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89308176101 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57250387669 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531446540881 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0694662589 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5294117647 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278216029802 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870065316923 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530555579581 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166296815954 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480353679511 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.