Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are play in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individuals sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Currently, there are an increasing number of people who are concerned about the fact that which is better, team sports or individuals sports. However, whether this is a debatable issue. My view is that both kind of sports has their own advantages for individuals, however, sports which played in team are more critical. Reason are as follows.
First, it is obvious that playing sports in team make the most of the teamwork's spirit of the public. This means that by being involved in team sports such as football or basketball, citizens can enhance their relationships with others. So, thanks to taking part in team sports, people can develope the friendship between not only members of their team but also members of the opponents.
Moreover, team sport can improve the responsibility of individuals of having mistakes. For example, Andy, my friend, who used to be very rude, he never said sorry or admited his faults before attended the school’s football club. Because of playing a key role in the club, he has to be responsible for his actions and behavior. Then, he known how to control his feeling and spared no effort to improve himself.
That is not say that individual sports are not crucial. Of course, they still have their own benefits. Especially, if you play a individual one, like jogging or swimming, you can play the way you want by yourself, which means you can enjoy the freedom with no strategies. But playing these type of sports can make people bored with athletics.
In sum, team sports provide a good condition to people to understand and boost the relationships and responsibilities. Meanwhile, individual sports provide a freedom feeling. However, we cannot just focus on team and ignore the opposite kind. By doing this, we can make sure that every one can be healthy and decide which type of sport is suitable for different individuals.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdow Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of survey asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'knew'?
Suggestion: knew
... for his actions and behavior. Then, he known how to control his feeling and spared n...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r own benefits. Especially, if you play a individual one, like jogging or swimmin...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, as to, for example, kind of, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9746031746 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7370787163 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55873015873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7447062346 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4736842105 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190589679732 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575781044944 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054431654623 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10969365408 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544790768822 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.