Some people think job satisfaction is more important than job security, while others believe that having a permanent job is better than enjoying the job. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Having a great job is absolutely an abstract definition because of differences in the critical thinking of different people. Some people contend that satisfaction in working is their preference in comparison with job commitments. On the other hand, a school of thought holds that they had better have a continuous occupation instead of immersing in working enjoyment. In this essay, I will discuss both views before addressing personal opinion.
There are some compelling reasons why that will be very ideal if you work in an enduring position. It acts as a precursor to your stable income, full of health and work insurances. Moreover, if people don't change their company, they don’t have to get used to adapting new working environments, colleagues, working conditions, even up-to-date technology which is strange to them. It is a major contributor to gain a steady life with strong commitments and no challenging and alternative things.
On the other hand, many people advocate subscribing to the view that the foremost sector of an ideal job is excitement. Working in a variety of environments gives them chances to understand dozens of working styles, learn and enhance some skills and knowledge, get along with diverse personalities and work in a group with many kinds of intelligent people. Therefore, all the aforementioned values help people become more creative, proactive, and confident. These opportunities are more impressive than all the commitment of a permanent position. This kind of job is more pretty fitted for people who tend to face challenges and would like to deal with adventurous situations.
In conclusion, I am convinced of all the advantages of both an exciting job and a secure job. Each kind of job has distinct values, which are suitable for their own preference and personality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ll discuss both views before addressing personal opinion. There are some compelling reasons why...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd work insurances. Moreover, if people dont change their company, they don’t have t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24315068493 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06386292967 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3894116758 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.066666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322697062659 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103456882693 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786453621505 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200934965108 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981559917429 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.