Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others believe that the main interest is in world business. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this modern life, there are many people believe that the best way to international cooperation is in the preserve of the environment and the life. Meanwhile, others people think that the main benefit is in world business and financial. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of the best way to international cooperation is in the business world. First, government subsidies for business are believed to equalize working and financial opportunities in young adolescents regardless of their background family. This financial support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall cooperation enrollment rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, support in world business would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that world business is imperative to foster economic growth and development technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once government just focus on support world business and didn’t protection the environment. First, offering all people to international cooperation would likely correspond with a tremendous working and pollution strain on a country. Generating no income environment activities and didn’t have any protection action on the country, companies could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as the healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, government just support on world business would tempt many young people including those who are not academically or show no interest in protection environment pursuits, thereby adding great burdens for company’s activities and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more working paths and reduce the pollution. It, instead would be a more benefit viable option if the resources on supporting less privileged yet gifted people.
In conclusion, despite the important role of world business and next generation’s development in the future. Government just focus on financial also have many drawbacks. It is, thus, hoped that netizens, especially government, should consider using it sensibly while maintaining develop country and balance other areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-21 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MinhGoal1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviors and situations by others the same age this is called peer pressure This will support this argument by analyzing the merits mentioned below 56
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 74
- Some people believe that children should be taught about recycling and avoiding waste at home while others believe children should learn this at school Discuss both views 56
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than solve Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76657824934 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05500517012 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570291777188 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.6189901578 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.875 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5625 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289507561362 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957123668693 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904487397009 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175641668947 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875221969295 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.