The map below compared 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010

Essay topics:

The map below compared 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010.

The map show information about liken two floor plats of one deal congress held in 2009 to 2010.
Overall, the meeting room witness radical changes with the most noticeable being the relocation and expansion of exhibition area and balcony.
Look at the first map in 2019. It can be seen that concert hall and stage divided into two separate areas, and concert hall inside have seat and one display area, with stage inside have meeting room. Meanwhile, floor plans in 2010 performance areas trans formed into exhibition areas. Instead of it a little piece of concert hall be a small part of the stage and staging is a big part. However, in 2009 the meeting room knocked down.
Look at the second map in 2010. Can easily see that between different floor plans in 2009 to 2010, at the first map exhibition area built at near the balcony. Meanwhile, in 2010 that area renovated at opposite the main entrance. Two floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 have only one registration but to 2010 have two registration, other registration built at above the stage. However, in 2009 have only was greatly extended to balcony with langue area. So the map mainly changes in the registration, balcony areas because that is an important areas.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-26 tieuquynh 84 view
2023-09-06 songuyen14 78 view
2023-08-10 Anne020304 73 view
2023-08-10 Anne020304 11 view
2023-08-10 Anne020304 73 view
Essays by user Trần Ánh Vy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'seated'.
Suggestion: seated
...ate areas, and concert hall inside have seat and one display area, with stage inside...
^^^^
Line 4, column 416, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e the stage. However, in 2009 have only was greatly extended to balcony with langue...
^^^
Line 4, column 556, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'area'?
Suggestion: area
...cony areas because that is an important areas.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77209302326 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45037276002 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506976744186 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2328222891 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9230769231 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305186344597 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116542214828 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110779919563 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189167099687 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140382615709 0.0819641961636 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.