Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others believe that the main interest is in world business. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Collaboration globally could bring about not only in the protection of the environment but also in cross-nation commercial. My essay would reveal some advantages of international activities.
There are plenty of reasons why someone believes that the award of cooperating internationally is in the protection of the environment. This means that the master plan is promulgated and submitted by co-authors who are the governments of like-minded nations. For example, Mekong Delta River has been damaged by hydro powers which are installed on the significant steams of the river. The governments of the countries based in the Mekong Delta area have approved the master plan in order to persuade development sustainability. This has been allowing the ecosystem of the river to be balanced and helping biologic diversity in the area.
On the other corner, globalization has been pushing international transaction effectively. Each nation could take advantage to produce goods and supply services with the lowest cost. They are willing to export them and import goods and services that they have no advantage competition. For instant, the Unite State of America has rich resource such as finance, technology and high skill workers and engineers to manufacture advance small phones. Natural land resource allows Vietnam to cultivate rice. As a result, Vietnam concentrate to produce rice and export farming products to USA and import the iPhone of Apple being a previous example.
In my perspective being conclusion, the reasonable theme could mention to a collection of several benefits which are generated via crossing border activities. either trading internationally is extremely significant to human beings or protecting the earth is the global mission might be resulted from the collaboration in over the world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-09-21 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
2024-08-30 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
2024-07-18 | MinhGoal1 | 78 | view |
2024-07-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 84
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress but they should be concerned about the quality at work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The proper name in singular (Vietnam) must be used with a third-person verb: 'concentrates'.
Suggestion: concentrates
...to cultivate rice. As a result, Vietnam concentrate to produce rice and export farming prod...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Either
...nerated via crossing border activities. either trading internationally is extremely si...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52688172043 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13129570345 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3643855364 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926541885203 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316928012955 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455153878576 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601166191924 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291661812113 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.