Some people think the manufacturers or shopping malls should sell less packaged products and others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is a matter of debate whether the manufacturers should reduce the amount of packaged products or customers should take responsibility for buying products with less packaging. In my opinion, the former is a viable solution to the problems faced by buyers.
On the one hand, individuals believing stores or companies should lessen the packaging of products is due to their concern of environmental protection. Discarded packaging from users is known to be one of the main culprits that contributes significantly to the environmental crisis. Thus, many people think that shops should offer fewer packaged goods to minimize the amount of thrown-away packaging on the streets or in oceans. Moreover, some packaging can be inconvenient for customers such as being multi-layered or bulky and wasting their time and effort when unpacking purchased items. Heavy packaging can also deter buyers from carrying products home due to its weight.
On the other hand, others assume that people are responsible for buying less packaged products because they argue that purchasers need to be conscious of their own preferences. If people purchase items like food or clothing and store them in their own containers or bags, this might decrease the demand for packaged products. Owing to this, many manufacturers have to gradually lessen the packaging, thereby preventing littering on roads or in seas.
Considering two notions, I believe that the second belief might be a suggestion to raise awareness of customers instead of helping them the most efficiently, because there are some people unfamiliar with this approach. As when a company reduces packaging, it emphasizes the need for consumers to provide their own bags or containers. Furthermore, less packaging means an easier access to products as it saves time and effort.
In conclusion, although raising people’s awareness of buying things with fewer packaging is practical, I believe that manufacturers’ approaches to reduce packaging are the most beneficial to every customer.
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think the government funding should be used for supporting art and cultures others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- In some countries health care is free paid for by the state In other countries payment is divided between the state and people themselves Discuss both systems and say which one is better 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42088607595 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02915881996 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8032930057 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.357142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400787258525 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134146024694 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101137766357 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230008639317 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527775818369 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42088607595 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02915881996 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8032930057 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.357142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400787258525 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134146024694 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101137766357 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230008639317 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527775818369 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.