Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For centuries, space has always been a subject of fascination and intrigue. Much like the stars and asteroids, wonder and curiosity collided and gave birth to innovation and discovery. With Copernicus and Galileo leading the path, it was only a matter of time when space exploration came into the spotlight. Developing advanced technology for venturing into the unknown universe is an expensive affair, which requires money of cosmic proportions; this has invited several concerns from the frugal communities of the world. So, is it truly justified? I believe so, yes.
Our planet is suffering; it has been for the last couple of decades. In their wake, urbanisation and industries have left behind a carnage of barren lands and endangered wildlife. Without the green cover of trees, global warming and pollution have led to dire consequences, one of which will be the end of survival on Earth. Scientists, like Elon Musk, have been encouraging the active search of a new planet which can sustain a better life. An estimation has already been made about the possible meltdown and demise of the South and North Poles by 2050, if actions are not taken immediately.
Other than finding a new home for the human race, scientists have always believed in the discovery of extraterrestrial life. The infinity guaranteed by the universe only confirms the probability of other forms of life in outer space. Studies and research also uncovers the existence of new elements and compounds which may be beneficial to us. Extensive space exploration holds the key to a well of unpredictable knowledge, capable of disproving and altering theories stated by mankind’s greatest minds.
In conclusion, the benefits of exploring space are far too many to ignore. Yes, it can be argued that the money spent on it can be used to resolve a variety of problems; but the rewards offered by space exploration outweighs its shortcomings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 56
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 84
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- In some countries only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12420382166 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91420764376 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627388535032 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.250643182 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6470588235 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52941176471 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157200104282 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420836871402 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424116051289 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936757830441 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579477458028 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.